Rational reasonably enlightens why going to war was

Rational actor
model puts emphases on the relationship between states, that will instantly
create judicious choices after deliberating the advantages and disadvantages. Consequently,
the rational actor model does not need “detailed information for analysis, this
makes the rational actor model practical and ideal in a crisis” (UK Essays, 201). However, even
though the rational actor model highlights the importance of interactions
between states rational actor model has a habit of ignoring “larger states with
complex bureaucratic natures that have
multiple and different types of branches with their own different political and
ideological viewpoints” (UK Essays, 201). 

The Rational
Actor Model adds to international politics by proposing that “governments are
unitary, they detect the problem; then look for and deliberate policy possibilities
and alternatives” (Marsh, 2014). Also, governments
examine “the cost-benefit of the decisions” (Marsh, 2014), and then continue
to choose the decision which is the most effective and “maximizes the utility
of the state” (Marsh, 2014). For example, the united
states going to war in the Persian Gulf, the rational actor model points out
the tactical collaboration amongst the US and Iraq and reasonably enlightens
why going to war was inevitable. The US had significant national interest in
the Persian Gulf to ensure its protection, the United States attempted
“diplomatic and economic alternatives to war” (Yetiv, 2004) it was up against an
obstinate Iraqi regime, and as time passed they saw “the costs of waiting for
agreements to take place exceeded the benefits” (Yetiv, 2004). Hence, noting
Iraq’s actions in the situation and if Iraq was to “withdraw from Kuwait” (Yetiv, 2004)  its ongoing threats, lead “Washington to
believe war was required” (Yetiv, 2004). On the other hand,
Iraq might or might not have come to a
parallel solution, but because both sides could not agree or discuss a
settlement this ultimately pushed the united states in the direction of war. Additionally, the structural step up of
anarchy in international relations imposed this judgment.
Therefore, the US had doubts and could not trust weather “Iraq would leave
Kuwait and not attempt to conquer Kuwait again” (Yetiv, 2004).
Likewise, Iraq was unsure of the united states and if their motives were
genuine or whether the US would attack it once, it approved the retreat from
Kuwait. For
this reason, Allison’s rational actor model adds to international theory a
deeper understanding of “unitary states as important players who behave
rationally, while thinking of costs and benefits of policy decisions to increase
value” (UK Essays, 201). Moreover, the Rational actor model could
possibly be beneficial to international politics “when a state lacks or does
not have accessible information on their opponent” (UK Essays,
Not to mention

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Another crucial
aspect of foreign policy analysis that adds to our understanding of
international politics, is the connection “between organizational and
governmental frameworks and foreign policy” (Tayfur, n.d.). Recognized as the
‘bureaucratic politics model, argued to be “the next step after ‘groupthink’ as
it concentrates on the part carried out by various bureaucrats in the foreign policy-making process” (Tayfur, n.d.). The bureaucratic politics
model stems from the idea “that during foreign
policy-making process and through its implementation governments depend
immensely on their governments” (Tayfur, n.d.). Graham Allison
created three models of analysis to understand foreign policy choices the
rational actor model, organizational
process model and bureaucratic politics model.


I'm Harold!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out