Criminal justice has been essentially the most contended facet of transitional justice for the duration ofand after German reunification. Sincerely there are three one of a kind approaches to dealwith the criminal remnants of a dictatorship after the transition to democracy:first, global amnesty; second, ignorance and oblivion; and 0.33, completeinvestigation and clarification of tasks in keeping with the guideline of regulation.Whilst the primary model was preferred in Latin america, Japan could also be consideredas an example of the second, and Germany of the 1/3 model. Accordingly sweepingmakes an attempt for crook justice after the trade from dictatorship to democracy area long way from self-evident. Mainly, a steady political drawback without an drawing closehazard of the return of historic elites constitutes a minimum prerequisite. In the caseof the GDR, as already recounted before, there have been other extra certain factors.Among them was once that already in the brief time between revolution and reunificationa few instances of voter fraud in the course of the GDR neighborhood elections in 1989 have beenincriminated and a number of defendants ultimately were located responsible of voter fraud.However, best after reunification a complete judicial process began aimingat these individuals who had dedicated movements of political persecution andhuman rights violations. It resulted in preliminary investigations by means of the publicprosecution and 75,000 court cases towards about 100,000 suspected folks (out ofa population of approximately 17 million)—the number does not contain casesof espionage, which most of the time affected noncitizens of the former GDR. The essentialoffenses have been killings at the German–German border, voter fraud, perversion ofthe direction of justice, denunciation, atrocities of the secret police, mistreatment ofcaptives, doping of athletes, misuse of authority and corruption, different fiscaloffenses, and espionage. To preclude conflicts with the good-founded principleof nulla poena sine lege (i.E., no penality with out regulation—which means one cannot bepunished for doing whatever that is not prohibited by legislation), the trials were basedon the penal code of the GDR, even even as they have been normally directed by using judgescoming from the West. One of the most weird legal consequences of this try andpreclude retroactive legislation was once that of Erich Mielke, the perfect rating secretpolice officer of the GDR, who was sentenced just for the homicide of two policemen,which he had dedicated already in 1931—18 years before the advent of theGDR—while he would no longer be convicted for countless crimes dedicated through theinfamous East German Stasi, which he had directed for many years.Finally, from firstly about one hundred,000 suspected individuals only one,286 defendantsclearly encountered a trial, and merely about 750 men (and just a fewwomen) were convicted. As few as 40 defendants got a prison sentence withoutparole. 9 criminal justice became traditionally a symbolic endeavor, which specificallyserved to ascertain the truth concerning the earlier. Former contributors of the GDR oppositionand victims of political suppression mostly didn’t feel secure with theunderlying refined difference of legislation and justice, which types a pivotal function of the liberal idea of the law.